On the opening night of Operation Desert Storm in 1991, the world watched in awe as grainy night-vision footage showed missiles cruising down the streets of Baghdad, turning at intersections like cars, before slamming into government buildings.
These were Cruise Missiles. Specifically, the BGM-109 Tomahawk.
Unlike their ballistic cousins which fly high into space, cruise missiles are essentially robot suicide airplanes. They fly low, slow, and smart. They hug the terrain, hiding behind hills and ridges to avoid radar.
But how does a missile know where a “hill” is? How does it fly for 1,500 kilometers over featureless deserts or oceans and land on a specific window frame without a pilot? The answer lies in a piece of Cold War ingenuity called TERCOM (Terrain Contour Matching).
This comprehensive technical guide explores the brain of the cruise missile, detailing how TERCOM and DSMAC integration allows these weapons to operate in GPS-denied environments.
The Problem: The “Drift” of Inertial Navigation
To understand why TERCOM was invented, we must first understand Inertial Navigation Systems (INS).
The Solution: TERCOM (Terrain Contour Matching)
Invented in the late 1950s and perfected in the 70s, TERCOM is effectively a “blind man’s map.”
How It Works
1. The Map: Before the mission, satellites create a digital 3D elevation map of the flight path. Planners slice this map into specific “checkpoints” or “matrices.”
2. The Radar Altimeter: The missile has a radar that looks down to measure the distance to the ground.
3. The Barometric Altimeter: The missile has a pressure sensor that measures its own altitude above sea level.
4. The Math:
5. The Match: As the missile flies over a hill, it sees the ground rise. It compares this “bump” pattern to the stored map in its memory.
6. The Fix: The missile updates its INS (“I thought I was 100m east, but I’m actually here”) and corrects course.
The Advantage: Unjammable
Unlike GPS, which relies on faint signals from space that can be jammed by a $50 device, TERCOM relies on the physical shape of the Earth. You cannot jam a mountain. Unless the enemy bulldozes the entire landscape, TERCOM will work.
DSMAC: The Final Eye
TERCOM is great for mid-course navigation (finding the city), but it isn’t accurate enough for the final hit (finding the building). Terrain can be relatively flat near the target.
Enter DSMAC (Digital Scene Matching Area Correlator).
The Flight Profile: “Nap of the Earth”
Combining INS, TERCOM, DSMAC, and (in modern times) GPS creates a flight profile known as Nap of the Earth.
Modern Evolution: Staying Relevant
Is TERCOM still relevant in the age of GPS? Yes, more than ever.
Vulnerabilities
Cruise missiles are not invincible.
1. Speed: They are slow (Subsonic). A fighter jet can easily catch them. Using an AWACS (radar plane) that looks down can spot them against the ground.
2. Chokepoints: TERCOM requires “rough” terrain to work. Flying over a flat sea or a desert is hard (no contours). Planners have to route missiles over specific “landfall” points, which defenders can guard.
Conclusion
Cruise Missile Technology is a testament to the power of autonomy. Long before self-driving cars, we had self-flying suicide robots.
The combination of TERCOM (feeling the ground) and DSMAC (seeing the ground) created a weapon that democratized strategic bombing. You no longer needed a massive bomber fleet; you just needed a truck, a computer, and a good map. As electronic warfare makes GPS unreliable, the “old school” method of reading the terrain is becoming the cutting edge once again.
Disclaimer: Technical descriptions are based on declassified manuals of the BGM-109 Tomahawk.